TelegramVault vs GitHub MTProto Proxies 2026

the short answer

The telegramvault vs github mtproto proxies question really comes down to what kind of account you are protecting. Free proxy lists from GitHub are the right tool for one specific job: getting Telegram to load on a personal device in a censorship-restricted country. For hosting a session with real value behind it, a business channel, a paid community, an account that took six months to build up, they are the wrong tool. TelegramVault wins on everything that drives account survival. The proxy lists win on price, friction to start, and geographic flexibility outside Singapore. Neither is dishonestly marketed. You just need to know which situation you are actually in.

what each one actually is

GitHub MTProto proxy lists are community-maintained repositories that aggregate publicly shared proxy server addresses. The most active ones pull entries from Telegram channels that publish fresh proxy IPs as older ones get burned and blocked, then compile those addresses into repos with hundreds or thousands of entries at any given time. The underlying infrastructure is almost always a cheap VPS from a commercial hosting provider: DigitalOcean, OVH, Hetzner, Vultr. When you configure one of these proxies in your Telegram client, the app routes its traffic through that server, and Telegram’s infrastructure sees the VPS’s IP address instead of yours.

Here is the part that matters: the IP is shared. Every person who downloaded the same list today is routing through the same address simultaneously. The moment a proxy URL appears in a public repo, it has been distributed to everyone subscribed to that list, and that number can run into the thousands on popular repositories. telegram.org/mtproto" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Telegram’s official MTProto protocol documentation describes how session state is bound tightly to authentication context. A session that authenticates on one IP and then connects regularly from a different one, through a shared VPS that hundreds of others are using at the same time, is not presenting the platform with a coherent identity signal.

TelegramVault is not a proxy and does not work like one. Each customer account gets a physical Android device in our Singapore server farm, with a real SIM card from SingTel, M1, StarHub, or Vivifi. That SIM has a Singapore mobile IP assigned to it. Same IP every day, not rotating, not shared with any other customer. The Telegram app on that device is the official Android client running on real ARM hardware. It produces a full device fingerprint: battery state, screen dimensions, radio metadata, the signal profile a legitimate phone generates. You log in once with your own phone number, your OTP lands on your personal device, and the TelegramVault hardware becomes the permanent home for a session you authorized on your own terms. You access it through a browser-based STF session from wherever you are, Tehran, Dubai, Lagos, Manila, London.

head-to-head on the things Telegram operators care about

where the competitor wins

The price case is not negotiable: GitHub MTProto proxy lists are free. If you are in Iran, Russia, or a country where Telegram is intermittently blocked and you just need the app to load on your personal device, a free proxy list solves that problem without spending a dollar. No commercial product needs to exist for that use case, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest.

Geographic flexibility is the other real advantage. Public proxy lists pull from servers across dozens of countries. If your session needs to appear to originate from Germany, Turkey, Indonesia, or the UK, some subset of the list will cover you, at least temporarily. TelegramVault is Singapore-only by design. If your required jurisdiction is not Singapore, it cannot help you.

For accounts that are genuinely disposable, bulk outreach or test accounts you expect to cycle through within a few weeks, proxy lists make reasonable economic sense as a routing layer. If the account costs nothing to replace, spending $99/month to protect it is irrational.

where TelegramVault wins

The failure mode that plays out on repeat for operators who take the proxy side of the telegramvault vs github mtproto proxies question and apply it to a valuable account goes like this.

The proxy IP is already public before you start using it. Everyone on that list is routing traffic through the same address at the same time. Telegram does not ban accounts solely for using a proxy. But it builds trust scores based on session consistency, and an account whose sessions come from a shared datacenter IP cycling through thousands of simultaneous users looks very different from a single person’s mobile usage. The pattern behind why Telegram bans accounts is almost never a single event. It is a sequence of signals that each individually seem minor but compound over time into a risk score the platform eventually acts on.

The datacenter IP problem runs deeper than sharing. IPs from DigitalOcean’s AS14061 or OVH’s AS16276 are among the most abused ranges on the public internet. Telegram has processed millions of sessions from those ASNs, from spam operations, from automation stacks, from scraping infrastructure. A session coming from a Hetzner IP is not treated the same as a session coming from a Vivifi SIM in Singapore. OONI’s network interference research across Iran, Russia, Egypt, and other restricted environments consistently documents that hosting-provider IP ranges receive categorically different treatment from platform-level filters than mobile carrier ranges, because the abuse signal in those blocks operates at a different scale entirely.

The churn dimension makes this worse. Public proxy lists have a shelf life measured in days. A proxy IP that is alive on Monday is often blocked by Wednesday because hundreds of people used it for behavior Telegram does not permit. Your account’s session history now spans three or four different IPs in a single week, each a shared datacenter address, each carrying its own accumulated abuse history. That kind of IP trajectory is exactly what Telegram’s anomaly detection was built to flag. EFF’s research on platform-level filtering describes how connection infrastructure consistency is one of the primary signals in platform-level trust systems, separate from content moderation entirely. The telegramvault vs github mtproto proxies comparison is ultimately a comparison between stable identity signals and unstable ones.

TelegramVault removes all of this noise at the root. The IP does not rotate. It is the same Singapore mobile IP the account has had since the first login. It belongs to a carrier ASN that looks like a single person using a Singapore SIM because that is exactly what it is. The device fingerprint is consistent because the device is real, persistent, and unchanging. Same IP. Same device. Same carrier. Same country. That is not a simulation of a legitimate user. It is one.

The BYO number model deserves specific attention. Many proxy-based setups push operators toward virtual numbers or numbers the provider controls, because maintaining a real SIM alongside a proxy-routed VPS is operationally complex. When the number is controlled by infrastructure you do not own, the session token for that account can in principle be regenerated by whoever holds the number. With TelegramVault, your phone number is yours. The OTP lands on your device, and the hardware simply provides a stable permanent home for a session you created. For operators building anything of real value on Telegram, the credential separation described in BYO number Telegram hosting is not an optional feature. It is the baseline for protecting the account from the ground up.

the cost math

Assumptions stated clearly:

• GitHub MTProto proxy: free proxy addresses, but you need a VPS to run your Telegram client continuously: $8-12/month
• account churn cost on the proxy path: $15-20 per replacement account in new number sourcing plus warm-up overhead, estimated at roughly one loss every 4-8 weeks for an account under active use on shared proxy IPs
• TelegramVault: $99/month for 1 account, $899/month for 15 accounts

1 account: - proxy path: $0 proxy + $10 VPS = $10/month, about $120/year before any replacements - if the account is lost every 6 weeks: roughly 8 replacements per year at $15-20 each = $120-160/year in replacement cost, plus the hours you spend re-warming a new account - total proxy path year 1: $240-280 plus operator time - TelegramVault: $99/month = $1,188/year - the TelegramVault premium is roughly $900/year if you lose one account every six weeks and value your time at zero - if the account represents a channel with 8,000 members, a customer support workflow, or 12 months of trust, the math changes completely

5 accounts: - proxy path: $0 proxy + $20 VPS + roughly $300-400 in annual replacements across the cohort = $440-520/year - TelegramVault: approximately $450-500/month at mid-tier pricing = $5,400-6,000/year - the proxy path is cheaper here unless account survival rates diverge significantly, which under active use they do

15 accounts: - proxy path: $0 proxy + $40 VPS + roughly $1,000-1,200/year in replacements = $1,480-1,640/year - TelegramVault: $899/month = $10,788/year - TelegramVault is not cost-competitive for pure volume if you treat account loss as an acceptable operating cost

The honest read: if your accounts are instruments and replacement is routine, proxy lists plus a VPS win the cost comparison at every tier. If your accounts are assets, the calculation changes, because assets that cannot be rebuilt cheaply do not have a replacement cost expressed in dollars.

a practical decision rule

If your accounts are disposable and you expect churn, the proxy path is the right call. If any account has real irreplaceable value, the telegramvault vs github mtproto proxies gap is not a close call.

More specifically:

• if you are in a censorship-restricted country and just need Telegram to load on your personal device, a free proxy list is the correct tool
• if you are running a community, a customer channel, a paid tier, or a trading desk, the proxy path is borrowing time you will repay in account losses
• if you have already lost a valuable account through a proxy rotation cycle, you have your answer
• if you need a non-Singapore IP origin, TelegramVault does not help

Before you commit to any proxy-based setup for a valuable account, check what you are actually routing through:

# Check the IP your Telegram traffic will exit from
curl -s https://ipinfo.io/json

# Check ASN and org for a specific proxy IP
curl -s "https://ipinfo.io/YOUR_PROXY_IP/json" | python3 -c "
import sys, json
d = json.load(sys.stdin)
print('IP:     ', d.get('ip'))
print('Org:    ', d.get('org'))
print('Country:', d.get('country'))
print('City:   ', d.get('city'))
"

If the “Org” field shows DigitalOcean, OVH, Hetzner, Vultr, AWS, Linode, or any VPS hosting provider, the IP is a datacenter address. Telegram has processed millions of sessions from those ASNs, many of them from automation and spam operations. Your session’s IP history is being written into that context. For a disposable account, that is acceptable. For an account worth keeping, it is a liability that compounds every week.

migration if you switch

Moving from a GitHub MTProto proxy setup to TelegramVault is cleaner than most operators expect. Your channels, groups, contacts, message history, pinned posts, and admin roles all live on Telegram’s servers, not on whatever VPS or device is currently running your client. Switching hardware does not touch any of that. The Telegram account is the asset. The device is just the current host.

The mechanics work like this. TelegramVault’s concierge process provisions your dedicated Android device in the Singapore farm before you touch anything. When you authorize a new session on that hardware, Telegram sends a login notification to your most recently active existing session. You confirm it, the session activates on the Singapore device, and for a brief window both the old and new sessions are live simultaneously. You then terminate the old session through Settings > Devices on any active client. The whole process is typically under 20 minutes. Nothing is lost: no channel memberships, no contacts, no history.

One thing to be deliberate about: if your old setup used a proxy that is currently active, terminate the Telegram session cleanly on that VPS before initiating migration rather than leaving it running. Overlapping active sessions from very different IP contexts, a datacenter VPS in Europe and a new Singapore mobile IP, can occasionally trigger an additional verification step from Telegram. It is minor and does not create actual account risk, but sequencing the handover cleanly avoids the extra friction. The concierge process walks through this step with you so you are not improvising the sequence alone.

final word

GitHub MTProto proxy lists are a legitimate tool for a specific job: getting Telegram to work when your network blocks it. For protecting accounts that represent real community, real revenue, or real infrastructure, they are not a foundation. They are a workaround. The telegramvault vs github mtproto proxies comparison looks different once you have watched an account built over a year disappear because the shared proxy it lived on accumulated enough abuse history to trigger a platform action. If you are at the point where that cost is real to you, the TelegramVault waitlist is where the conversation starts.